The Impact of War on Animals in Conflict Zones
War deeply impacts animals and their guardians living in conflict zones.
Originally published in Psychology Today
by Dr. Katherine Compitus
Dr. Katherine Compitus a Clinical Assistant Professor at NYU Silver School of Social Work and Director of NYU’s Veterinary Social Work program. She is a biopsychologist focusing on the human-animal bond and trauma studies, particularly within human-animal interactions. She is a Certified Family Trauma therapist and, among myriad societal aspects of health and healing, specializes in Animal-Assisted Interventions and promoting health equity for people of color.
Key Points
- Pets and livestock suffer greatly in war, lacking food and safety.
- Aid groups strive to aid animals amidst resource scarcity.
- Policies for animal evacuation in conflicts are crucial.
In regions marred by conflict, such as Gaza, the toll of war extends beyond human suffering to impact countless innocent animals, including pets. The devastating effects of warfare on these animals and their people reveal a poignant aspect of conflict that often remains overshadowed by more immediate human concerns. This post delves into the hardships faced by animals and their guardians in war-torn areas, shedding light on their struggles and the initiatives aimed at alleviating their distress.
The Plight of Animals in Conflict Zones
War zones present a dire environment for all living beings, and animals are no exception. In places like Gaza, where intermittent conflicts have created continuous instability, animals endure multiple challenges. These include the destruction of their habitats, scarcity of food and water, and the risk of injury or death from bombings and gunfire. Domestic animals, such as dogs and cats, often become strays when their homes are destroyed or when they are abandoned by families forced to flee. Livestock, too, suffer without adequate care, as their owners may be displaced or killed.
The psychological impact on these animals is profound. Animals experience stress and anxiety similar to humans, and the sounds and chaos of war can lead to long-lasting behavioral issues. Once docile pets may become aggressive or fearful, complicating rescue and rehabilitation efforts.
The Human-Animal Bond as Tested by War
For companion animal guardians, the psychological toll of witnessing their animals’ suffering is immense. Many families regard their pets as integral family members. The distress of potentially losing these companions, coupled with the inability to provide for them adequately during crises, can exacerbate the psychological strain experienced in conflict situations.
Furthermore, the logistics of evacuating with pets adds another layer of difficulty during emergencies. Many refugee shelters do not allow animals, forcing owners to make heart-wrenching decisions: flee to safety and leave their pets behind, or stay in dangerous conditions to not abandon them.
Rescue and Relief Efforts
Despite the grim circumstances, hope persists through the efforts of various organizations dedicated to rescuing and caring for animals in conflict zones. In Gaza, local and international groups work tirelessly to provide medical care, food, and shelter for displaced animals. These organizations often operate in dangerous conditions, with limited resources, to ensure that animals are not forgotten amidst human crises.
One notable effort is the work of local veterinarians and volunteers who organize feeding stations and temporary shelters. These initiatives not only help animals survive but also provide some comfort to owners knowing that there are resources available for their pets.
Challenges Faced by Aid Organizations
Delivering aid to animals in war zones is fraught with challenges. Access to affected areas can be restricted due to ongoing fighting or political barriers. Additionally, the prioritization of human aid often means that resources for animals are scarce, forcing rescue organizations to operate with minimal funding and supplies.
Moreover, the psychological state of animals, traumatized by the war, makes rescue operations slower and more dangerous. Rescuers must approach animals with caution, as fear can make them unpredictable and more likely to lash out.
The Path Forward
Addressing the needs of animals in conflict zones requires a coordinated approach that includes government, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and the international community. Policy changes that recognize the welfare of animals as part of humanitarian efforts during conflicts are crucial. These might include planning for animal evacuations alongside human evacuations or establishing more animal-friendly shelters in war-torn regions.
Education and awareness are equally important. Highlighting stories of animals and their owners in conflict zones can drive more support and funding to the organizations working on the ground. By understanding the shared suffering of humans and animals, we can foster a more compassionate response to the ravages of war.
Conclusion
The effects of war extend far beyond the battlefield, deeply affecting the lives of both people and animals. In Gaza and similar regions, the resilience of humans and their pets against the backdrop of conflict is a testament to the enduring strength of the human-animal bond. Supporting rescue efforts and advocating for policies that protect these vulnerable beings are ways we can all contribute to mitigating the impacts of war on animals and their caring humans.
Kim Hightower is the associate editor for PAN Works.
Please visit PAN Works for more about our work on ethics and animal wellbeing.